“Lala” is a Sanskrit word that translates to “brave”. It’s used in many different contexts, like in fighting a battle or when describing a person’s bravery. But the word “lala” is most commonly associated with bravery, not courage. Yet these are the same qualities that define bravery. In fact, courage is the first quality that comes to mind when I think of “lala” in Hindi.
For me, the definition of lala is still in the same context as its definition in English, and it means “able to endure.” I would still be able to endure a long, painful death, but I won’t be able to endure long periods of boredom or sadness. In Hindi, lala is the opposite of bravery, and it is the quality that defines cowardice.
I don’t know about you, but I am pretty scared to die. So when I read the definition of lala in Hindi, I am glad to see the word as that which defines courage. Yet the way the Hindi word lala is defined, it is not the opposite of bravery, but the opposite of cowardice. It is defined as that which is difficult and dangerous, and courage is defined as a quality that is easy and comfortable.
This all came to me while discussing the use of the word lala with my mother. She was trying to explain to me why I shouldn’t be afraid of death by saying she would die, and that she would be so happy. I was like, “Dont you have any pride at all? You’re about to die. There is no way you can be afraid. You’re just going to die.
She was right; you can be afraid, and that is exactly why it is important to be strong. Being afraid of death is not the same as being afraid of whatever might come next. You can be afraid of how your life is going to end, or you can be afraid of the future, but you cant be afraid of death.
This is why I always found it so difficult to tell people about this game. The more I try to explain, the more it seems like I have a hard time getting people to understand. When youre just describing a scene or a character, youre bound to make it sound like they are just like any other character in a game, and theyre all just like you. And that is just not true.
When you play the game, you are not playing a character in a video game. The game is a story that you are involved in, and your goal is to get the most important person alive in the picture. When you play the game, you are not playing a character in a video game. It’s a real character in a real life story. It’s a character that is trying to take back his life.
In our case, we are not playing a character in a video game, because we are a part of the story, and the story is real. We are a part of the story that is trying to take back the lives of those people in our game. Its a fictional game, created by the people who made the game, but its a real story. But you shouldnt try to make a game out of a story that doesn’t make sense in the first place.
You can’t make a game out of a fiction, that’s like a comic book, a movie, or a book. You can make a game out of a novel or a story, but you cant make a game out of your imagination. The game of a story should be something you can control. If you are not playing your imaginary game, you have no control.
Like many modern games, Lala Lajpat Rai is set in India. But its a story, not a story-driven game. The problem is that the story is about an imaginary game, that is based on the story of a fictional game, and it doesn’t make sense in the first place. It makes no sense at all. This is because a story is something that is told, not made. So its not like a story can be made.